<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>US Mobile Industry&#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usmobileindustry.com/tag/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usmobileindustry.com</link>
	<description>The US is different, mobiley.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>HTTPS and the future of mobile proxied web</title>
		<link>http://www.usmobileindustry.com/https-future-mobile-proxied-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usmobileindustry.com/https-future-mobile-proxied-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnkgrl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usmobileindustry.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dennis Bournique of WAP review has written an excellent article telling the world why the W3C&#8217;s proposed handling of HTTPS by proxy servers is a REALLY BAD IDEA. Over at About Mobility, C.Enrique Oritz has posted his HELL YEAH article, stating how BAD AN IDEA it is to even call it HTTPS.  The problem is [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-29" style="margin: 10px;" title="network-diagram" src="http://www.usmobileindustry.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/network-diagram.jpg" alt="network-diagram" width="295" height="158" />Dennis Bournique of <a title="WAP Review - Transcoders and HTTPS" href="http://wapreview.com/blog/?p=2653">WAP review has written an excellent article</a> telling the world why the W3C&#8217;s proposed handling of HTTPS by proxy servers is a REALLY BAD IDEA.</p>
<p>Over at About Mobility, C.Enrique Oritz has <a title="C.Enrique Oritz - The WAP gap all over again" href="http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2009/01/29/the-wap-gap-all-over-again-w3c-https-and-transcoding/">posted his HELL YEAH article</a>, stating how BAD AN IDEA it is to even call it HTTPS.  The problem is that the W3C HTTPS standard will allow traffic from your mobile browser to your (encrypted server) Bank to be decrypted by proxied transcoders, like Opera.  The user thinks his data is secure, because it&#8217;s HTTPS, when infact, the return traffic from the Opera proxy server is not encrypted.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>What do you think?  Leave a comment!</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usmobileindustry.com/https-future-mobile-proxied-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
